![]() ![]() So expensive waterless coolant does not benefit a manufacturer. Antifreez / water mix will do a perfectly good job in a new vehicle, long before any issues begin to show a vehicle will be long out of warranty. I'm simply saying I use it and have done for some time with no issues and some benefits. They will quote reasons why their product is better than water, but remember that they are a business that are trying to part you with your money when you can get water for free.Ĭlick to expand.I agree with a lot of what you are saying T and I'm not endorsing this product or Evans themselves. Evans is trying to take over with something that does not have the thermal transfer capability of water. To be fair to any of us sceptics, water has been used as a coolant for many years now and has done a good job. but there is no free alternative to petrol, so they have yo by the short and curleys. I don't think that BP would tell you what is in their expensive petrol. If a consumer wants to know what is in a product before buying, but the seller will not expose the contents, then why would that consumer have any confidence in the product? Jobless Witnesses sometimes turn up at my door to try and persuade me that there choice would be good for me, but all that they do is alienate me against what they are pushing. I am not saying that anyone should not use it, it is personal choice what we choose to put into any bike that we own, but as soon as one person starts trying to persuade other to follow that same choice, then the others will question why Ducati don't use it from new. They will quote reasons why their product is better than water, but remember that they are a business that are trying to part you with your money when you can get water for free. Click to expand.To be fair to any of us sceptics, water has been used as a coolant for many years now and has done a good job. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |